Ruby Mountain Press
  • HOME
  • Contact Us
  • A Teen's Guide To The Conversation Game
  • Good Conversation
  • Green Light Leadership
  • Language Soup
    • LISTEN to a native speaker
  • Trees of Joe
  • And Then There is Love
  • The Bop and Grop Series
    • Bop and Grop
    • Bop and Grop Go Shopping
    • Bop and Grop Meet Dinosaurs
    • Bop and Grop Explore the Ocean
    • Bop and Grop and the Great Race
  • Poompoms Series
    • Poompoms at School
    • Poompoms Get Another Pet
  • An American Family's LIfe in Kobe, Japan
  • When The Lights Go Out, I'm Not Afraid of the Dark
  • Terrific Termites
  • Delightful Dung Beetles
  • Blog

June 08th, 2015

6/8/2015

1 Comment

 
Is Character Education becoming Gri-Grow-Sess?

A recent article on KUNC http://www.kunc.org/post/non-academic-skills-are-key-success-what-should-we-call-them  suggested that all nonacademic learning needed another encompassing name and suggested relatively meaningless acronyms like Gri-Grow-Sess or N-COG might be options in the future.  Referencing part of this article: There's a lot of different terms floating around but also a lack of agreement on what really is most important to students.

As Noah Webster, the great American lexicographer and educator, put it back in 1788, "The virtues of men are of more consequence to society than their abilities; and for this reason, the heart should be cultivated with more assiduity than the head."

 Character education has a long history in the U.S., with a major vogue in the 1930s and a revival in the 1980s and 1990s. Beginning a few years ago, the KIPP charter schools in New York City started to emphasize a curriculum of seven "character strengths": grit, zest, optimism, self-control, gratitude, social intelligence and curiosity. "We're not religious, we're not talking about ethics, we're not going to give any kind of doctrine about what is right from wrong," says Leyla Bravo-Willey of KIPP Infinity in Harlem. "But there are some fundamental things that make people really great citizens, which usually include being kind." West argues that the use of "character" is inappropriate in research and policymaking because of its moral and religious connotations.”  West notes that there is a tension with the notion of character, which often “implies something being good in and of itself—which often includes some notion of self-sacrifice.”

The word character comes from the Greek kharakter, meaning an "engraved mark" which is extended by metaphor to mean a defining quality or sum of qualities of a person. (Ref. http:etymonline.com). Character seems like a good word to define a person's expression of honesty, kindness, respect, responsibility, perseverance, integrity--which are all critical bits of trustworthiness in life. These qualities are necessary in our communities, relationships, and world. Some notion of sacrifice of self-interest, selfishness, and self-focus does build room to be conscious and concerned and act for others. Without such things defined and taught and appreciated through shared stories for example, we are leaving a critical gap.

Other skills like being able to converse, write a letter, organize time, commit to growth, being creative, using media well, are distinct from deep defining character. Complicated acronyms might obscure rather than clarify. The terms character and skills make sense for attention and driving improvement.
1 Comment
Joshua Fitzgerald link
10/24/2022 04:51:06 pm

Who practice treat well thought national. Herself success line no radio capital when either.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Dr. Kathryn Knox is a life-long educator, consultant, and author.

    Archives

    August 2017
    October 2016
    July 2016
    July 2015
    June 2015
    April 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    July 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    March 2013
    December 2012

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed